Christians angry at Jerusalem lockdown as Easter clashes with Passover
Omar Karmi, Foreign Correspondent
Christians able to get into Jerusalem attend the Ceremony of the Holy Light at the site where they believe Jesus was resurrected. Oliver Weiken / EPA
RAMALLAH // Today, by a quirk of the calendar, eastern and western Christians will celebrate Easter together, an irregular occurrence. With the Jewish holiday of Passover at the same time, however, a tightly locked-down Jerusalem has been the focus of festivities, and tension, for days now.
For most Palestinian Christians, even those from Jerusalem, the celebrations that will take place today will be off-limits as was the Ceremony of the Holy Light, yesterday. Israel “closes” the West Bank for Jewish holidays, and with Passover running until April 6, all of Easter is included.
Normally, Palestinian Christians have a slightly easier time of obtaining permits to enter Jerusalem during Christian holidays than Muslims do during Muslim holidays. But with Jerusalem tense in recent weeks, because of demonstrations against Israeli settlement building in East Jerusalem, Christians were told last week that their permits would not apply this year.
That order was supposed to have been relaxed a little after pressure was brought to bear on Israel from abroad. On Wednesday, Michael Oren, the Israeli ambassador to the United States, said the travel ban had been lifted in response to concerns conveyed to the Israeli Embassy by Reverend Michael Kinnamon, the general secretary of the National Council of Churches in the US.
“I hope the Israeli government realises that it is unacceptable to us that Christians be denied the right to worship in Jerusalem, especially Christians whose roots in the region go back to the time of Christ,” Rev Kinnamon had told the Christian Post on Tuesday.
As of yesterday, Palestinian Christians were still complaining that they had no access to Jerusalem, even if they carried permits, and no access to the Old City of Jerusalem, even if they had Jerusalem IDs.
“This year is worse than any other year,” said Peter Nasser, a Jerusalem resident.
Mr Nasser, who runs a restaurant in Ramallah, explained that every year for the past few years, Christians have had to obtain permits from their churches to get into Jerusalem, if they have West Bank IDs, or the Old City and the main Christian sites there, including the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, if they hold Jerusalem IDs.
But with the confluence of eastern and western Easter as well as Passover, this year, said Mr Nasser, Christians from Jerusalem were not being allowed into the Old City at all, while West Bank ID holders could not enter the city. “They let tourists in. They have to give some priority to Christians.
Most of those who come to this country come to see the Christian sites. Israel can’t really marginalise Christians completely. Unless you’re a local: this year, we are completely marginalised.”
The army says it has relaxed the closure for Easter, but both in the local press and on the electronic grapevine, the unofficial means by which news of closures spread via SMS, e-mail, Facebook and other technology, Christians were warning each other yesterday not to try to get to Jerusalem. Instead, Ramallah was teeming with people for the Ceremony of the Holy Light, which is marked with scout marching bands, who come from the nearby villages.
Some of those attending, such as Abu George, who had come from the nearby village of Taybeh with his wife and two children, said he would normally have gone to Jerusalem.
“But this morning I received a message from a cousin that Israel is not allowing anyone into the Old City and that they are stopping people at checkpoints into the city. So I thought I’d come to Ramallah instead. At least we can be a part of something.”
The closure only adds to the pressures on a community that is already dwindling. Before 1948, the Christian community in what is now the occupied Palestinian territories constituted about 15 per cent of the population, mostly concentrated in Jerusalem and Bethlehem and the nearby towns and villages, including Ramallah. Today, it is about two per cent.
In what is now Israel, Christians made up five per cent of the population, mostly centred around Nazareth. There, too, Christians now also make up only around two per cent.
Higher Muslim birthrates and the mass influx of Jews in the late 1940s also altered the demographics. But there is little doubt that Christians continue to leave, an emigration that took on new impetus with the Al Aqsa intifada in 2000.
Those who could took advantage of traditionally stronger links to the outside world, especially to North and South America, where Palestinian emigration started at the turn of the 19th century, to escape a political and economic pinch that shows little sign of abating.
It is the slow decline of a historic population; the only Christian population with roots in the land of Jesus. There is angry irony in this for some.
“If the Palestinian population before 1948 had been mostly Christian, England and other European countries would never have allowed anyone to colonise this country,” said Mr Nasser.

lili said,
April 4, 2010 at 17:50
I did the religion thing when I was a kid but not now. However the more I see this incredible non-stop, everlasting madness with Israel the more I’m inclined to think they are going to be in huge trouble.
The sheer maliciousness of the things they do is stunning. If they truly believe in God they HAVE to know that preventing others from the worship of God cannot end well.
If many humans believe in God they surely have to know at some point(if they believe in his ability to punish or correct for sins) that a huge block of reckoning is coming.
No matter what you are into-this is a recipe for disaster. No matter is you believe in be it an eye for an eye, what goes around comes around, murphys law, karma, or just plain revenge for bad deeds. None of this is going to end well.
Aufzuleiden / CrazyComposer said,
April 4, 2010 at 20:06
If the people being denied access are Palestinian Christians, or people who actually live in that area, then outrage is an appropriate response – otherwise, what is all the fuss about? There is nothing in Christianity that says we are to make pilgrimages – ever. Not a word is spoken of this as a part of being a Christian. Those who make going to the ‘Holy Land’ an integral part of their ‘faith’ as Christians are, quite often, following in the footsteps of the mother of Emperor Constantine who, hundreds of years after the fact, decided where she thought the birthplace of Jesus was, as well as the place of his death and resurrection.
Unfortunately, none of her ‘holy sites’ match up with critical analysis (for one thing, the site of the crucifixion – Golgotha – is placed within the perimeter of the walls of the Old City of Jerusalem … something that would not have been allowed … similarly the tomb of Jesus – or Joseph of Arimathea – was located within the city limits – a place where graves were not placed in the time of Jesus). Of course, Catherine was not concerned with such issues, she simply wanted to share her faith with the heathen of the Ottoman Empire … but that was not the way to do it – you don’t get people to believe things by believing in false symbols and fake monuments.
As for the ‘Holy Land’ and Christians, its importance to our faith has more to do as the source of all for which we are eternally thankful; otherwise, it is the future site of a grand conflagration that is well on course to taking place due to the ongoing actions of the genocidal State of Israel with its ongoing backing from the United States.
Considering the fact that there is a movement in Israel – a foundation to rebuild the temple – that has already started building a scale-sized temple, one must ask the question: how are they planning to re-capture the grounds upon which the current ‘temple’ stands … grounds upon which the Islamic world has two of its holiest sites? The “Dome on the Rock” is not going to be moved – but it could be destroyed by some fanatical Judaic terrorist who wants to usher in the Messianic age by rebuilding the Temple of Solomon.
Alas, many Christians support this plan – out of sheer ignorance. I will not discuss this further – suffice it to say, any Christian that has been seduced by these Zionist plans has failed to fully study the final book of the New Testament and the unfolding of events, particularly those surrounding the Temple in relationship to the eschatological time-line. Any temple that we see in Jerusalem in this age is NOT a good thing. Period.
Wake up and smell the bodies burning.
Wie viel ist Aufzuleiden!
Edgar said,
April 4, 2010 at 23:33
The “rapture” Prophets for PROFIT are ANTI-Christ DEATH CULTISTS. God/Jesus put you in this LIFE to learn “soul lessons”, to increase your consciousness to the point of Redemption. Hagee and his Ilk REJECT the LIFE God gave you, and dangle a “shortcut” in front of people, just as SATAN dangled Temptation in front of Jesus. Do not follow the ANTI-Christ lies of FALSE prophets. Their “shortcut” of cheating God’s lessons does NOT lead to Heaven, any more than cheating on school work teaches you the subject. Hagee, Robertson, the whole group, do NOT believe in anything except the MONEY they collect for leading their Flocks astray.
“Judeo-Christian” is an OXYMORON. WAR-God vs PEACE-God. The Old Testament followers worship a WAR GOD and spend their lives hating, reliving every imagined slight, and dreaming of VENGEANCE ….. “NEVER FORGIVE and NEVER FORGET” …. they still go on about Egypt and Babylon after MILLENIA. New Testament followers (are supposed to) worship a loving, forgiving God, and to CLOSE the Old Testament, as it has been FULFILLED by the Crucifixion of Jesus. If you are following the OLD Testament you ARE NOT and CANNOT be a CHRISTian.
Aufzuleiden / CrazyComposer said,
April 5, 2010 at 15:04
Well said, Edgar – you have summed up the true theology of Christianity quite well: “I came to fulfill the law, not to abolish it” is one of the most important things that was spoken by Jesus. It is in reference to the fulfillment of the prophesies regarding his birth and that, with his coming, the Law – particularly in relation to the sacrifices relating to sin and sanctification – were completely and utterly fulfilled, no longer requiring the spilling of blood.
This is why there is still confusion amongst people who call themselves Christians around such issues as the death penalty even after Jesus addressed this directly with the woman who was about to be stoned for having sinned – having broken the Law of the Lord (it is irrelevant as to what she did for, at that time, the breaking of many of the Laws resulted in the punishment of death). She deserved to die – under the Law – but Jesus delivered her from this end by simply asking her jury which one of them was in a more righteous position; which one of them, having examined their consciences, could admit that they were completely ‘without sin’ and able to throw the first stone.
Suffice it to say, when facing someone that they recognized could see the content of their hearts, these men knew they could not get away with boastful claims of spiritual purity. They understood that they were all in need of reconciliation with their Lord, that they all needed to put their spiritual houses in order before taking the life of another for breaking a law that they had broken in their own hearts.
That is the problem with living under the Law of the Lord: it is, by design, impossible to fulfill. There is no way – especially in this age, without the Temple – for someone to live a life without compromising the Law on a regular basis. You may try, but you will fail; thus the need for a more permanent solution: a single sacrifice – a single Paschal Lamb for the redemption of sin.
Then you get the distortions from the man-made church. People who decided that the way described in the Word wasn’t good enough: they had to add their own twist in order to manipulate, control, and ‘guide’ their ‘flock’ into the ‘bosom’ of the Lord. Bunk. The problem with this is that they mostly have no relationship to the truth presented in the Word and aren’t even close to true Christianity.
The most amazing thing is that the Bible itself spoke of this when Jesus said that there would be many who called themselves by His name but He didn’t know them. This has always fascinated me – as though, right from the beginning, it was expected that there would be corruption and a bastardization of the true church and its message.
Why? Easy: the LOVE of money is the root of all evil; not money, the LOVE of money. Religion is big business and charity is even bigger, these ‘mega churches’ rake in hundreds of millions of dollars and their ministers are making empires for themselves. They should be reminded of the scripture that says it will be easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into heaven. Is this allegorical or practical? What about a generous rich person who is a good custodian of wealth? As the saying goes, that’s between you and God … but, to whom much is given, much is expected.
All I know is this: religion is sin for it serves to separate man from a vital relationship with God which is what Christianity is designed to reestablish. Christianity, on the other hand, makes a lousy religion; if you decide to follow the ‘Laws’ you have to take all of them – all 613 of them, there’s no cherry-picking when it comes to the Word … it’s all or nothing.
Wie viel ist Aufzuleiden!