GROUND ZERO MOSQUE HAS BECOME AN ISRAELI PSYCHOTIC ISSUE

STUPID IS AS STUPID WRITES…..

Caroline Glick
Yesterday I posted an essay about those who oppose the mosque as being the real threat….


Proving the above to be correct, psycho gal from the Jerusalem Post added her voice to the opposition…. making the mosque issue an Israeli one, and once again proving that she is in desperate need of psychiatric help….


Her twisted ‘logic’ starts off with;


Of course, none of those who have voiced opposition to the mosque project at Ground Zero have claimed that the Islamic group behind the mosque project is acting unlawfully in seeking to construct a mosque. The nearly 70 percent of Americans who oppose building a mosque at Ground Zero oppose the mosque because they believe it is wrong to build a mosque at the site where less than a decade ago Muslims acting in the name of Islam murdered nearly 3,000 people in an act of war against the US and an act of terror against the American people.

She continues….

The US leader who has rejected the expressed views of 68 percent of his fellow citizens in favor of the construction of a mosque at Ground Zero is not going to be moved by reason. The American president who defends the Ground Zero mosque builders even though their leader refuses to acknowledge that Hamas is a terrorist organization and has claimed that the US had the Sept. 11 attacks coming to it; and the American president who upholds the Palestinian cause even though it is virulently, and often genocidally anti-Semitic is not going to be appeased by Israeli building freezes and other confidence building gestures.

What this means is that Netanyahu and his deputies must concentrate on defending Israel and advancing its national interests. It is in Israel’s national interests to guarantee the civil rights and property rights of Jews. It is in Israel’s national interests to forthrightly set out and defend Israel’s legal rights in Judea and Samaria and its sovereignty in united Jerusalem. It is in Israel’s national interest to enforce its laws without prejudice towards all its citizens and expect all its citizens to respect its laws.

We are dealing with a self-consciously radical President who intends to remake the US relationship with the Muslim world. We will find no understanding from him.

The rest of today’s rant can be read HERE

Standing on a landmine

By CAROLINE B. GLICK

4 Comments

  1. JonnyX said,

    August 17, 2010 at 18:34

    It kills me that these Israeli hacks are constantly taking shots at Obama, even though he has to do up Bibi’s trousers and stand up to make any statements whatsoever, unless he likes to talk with his mouth full. To hear that “It is in Israel’s national interest to enforce its laws without prejudice towards all its citizens” nearly made me bust a gut at the irony!

  2. michael mazur said,

    August 18, 2010 at 07:42

    Seeing as wtc7, a steel framed building like the other two, collapsed but without being hit by a plane, then it should follow that those two buildings, wtc1&2, didn’t need to be hit by planes to fall down, as unburnt particles of nano thermite were found in the dust of the blast pulverised concrete.

    We know that steel framed buildings can burn for days, and though all the flammables are burnt out, the steel frame remains intact and as upright as before.

    There are photographs of the still smoking wtc1&2 ruins where the stumps of the upright steel members had been cut at an angle by a process resembling that of a oxyacetylene cutter.

    Clearly, had the nano thermite not been prepositioned in the critical places throughout the three buildings in the weeks preceding 91101 then not even several planes would have brought down bldgs 1&2 as we know that the fires had nearly died out when the bldgs fell – and not in the order of being hit.

    There were no Arabic names on the passenger manifests. Furthermore half of the 19 alleged to have hijacked the planes came forward to announce that they were still alive.

    Why did George Bush and Dick Cheney testify in camera to the 911 Commission, and why was their testimony sealed ?

  3. Amerikagulag said,

    August 18, 2010 at 16:06

    Just one little note:

    “…What this means is that Netanyahu…..” FKA Bibi MILIKOVSKY, the Lithuanian and not a semite….

    Just sayin’

  4. Rick said,

    August 19, 2010 at 04:04

    I loathe Mr. Obama, But, I have to admit that I agree with him here. The Muslims in the US are subject to US law, so why not US rights. In this instance the 1st amendment.

    The people who protest the Mosque are following the script handed them since the Clinton administration. Muslims are all a threat according to US mainstream media.

    These protesters have never even took the time to read even a sentence of the Koran much less study what is taught within it’s pages. I am not a follower of any religion and do not trust organized religion. But, I do support the rights of every human being on Earth.

    To lump everyone together is wrong. Period. If we could eliminate religion from the equation, and begin to recognize each other as equals on a human level, we could actually see some real changes in the world.

    We are all born knowing right from wrong until we are taught different.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,143 other followers

%d bloggers like this: