A ‘FABRICATED’ DEATH THAT WAS FOR REAL

 Despite Israeli denials, 12 year old Mohammed al-Dura was murdered by IDF fire 13 years ago. The only thing fabricated about the case is the newly released report including a YouTube video.
*
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in September ordered an investigation into the incident which Israel sees as a blight on its image and an enduring inspiration for violence against it.
*

Palestinian Father Hits Back Over Israel Claim Son Wasn’t Really Killed in Video

Blasts Report Casting Doubt on Death as ‘Fabrication’

*
YOUTUBE 

By Reuters

A Palestinian father whose son was captured on tape being shot in an iconic 2000 video that helped launch the intifada hit back at Israeli claims that the video is a fraud.

In Gaza, Jamal al-Dura denounced an Israeli report casting doubt on the death as “a new fabrication”. In an interview with Reuters, he demanded an international investigation, including Arab participation, into “what happened to me and my son”.

Twelve-year-old Mohammed al-Dura and his father, Jamal, were filmed crouching in terror by a wall in the Gaza Strip in September 2000, bullets whizzing around them, as Israeli forces battled Palestinian gunmen days into an uprising that erupted after failed peace talks.

The boy was later pronounced dead, and his father wounded.

Al-Dura spoke out after Israel demanded a French television station on Sunday correct a report from nearly 13 years ago which helped fuel anger across the world and ignite a bloody uprising against the Jewish state.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in September ordered an investigation into the incident which Israel sees as a blight on its image and an enduring inspiration for violence against it.

Israel at first apologised then blamed Palestinian militants for the death of Dura, whose lifeless image was shown around the world, turning him into a martyr in Arab countries.

The 36-page Israeli report said the France 2 accusation that troops had killed Dura was “destructive” and said it had fuelled attacks for years by Islamist militants against it as well as American targets, and “served as an inspiration and justification for terrorism, anti-Semitism.”

Based on its review of the film, the Israeli report said “there is no evidence that the Israeli military was in any way responsible for causing any of the alleged injuries” to the boy and his father.

“The review showed that it is highly doubtful that bullet holes in the vicinity of the two could have had their source in fire from the Israeli position,” it said.

The document also questioned whether the footage supports conclusions that either Palestinian victim was hurt during the film clip. “There are numerous indications that the two were not struck by bullets at all,” the report said.

“There remains a need to publicly correct and clarify the France 2 narrative as a first step towards moderating the report’s destructive effects,” it added.

In response to Israel’s report, France 2 said in a statement it “has shown a willingness to participate in any official independent investigation, carried out according to international standards”.

It said it was also ready to help exhume the boy’s “to help clarify the circumstances” of his death.

Source

1 Comment

  1. izzy said,

    May 20, 2013 at 20:35

    there is so much more to this story. even france and the cameraman admit it could have been palestinians as well. i like your blog, and i understand there is an agenda, but dont put that much of a spin ion it


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,169 other followers

%d bloggers like this: