My readers are well aware of who Cindy Sheehan is and what she stands for. She is outspoken, brave and wise…

Hillary Clinton would like us to think the same of her. Perhaps those in the Lobby do, but the reality is as follows….

Hillary for President?
by Cindy Sheehan
January 21, 2007

Thirteen people killed in a helicopter crash yesterday in Iraq. Four other soldiers and one marine were also killed.

30 people dead in the last two days in a war that Senator Hillary Clinton has supported since she first voted “yea” to give Bloody George carte-blanche to invade Iraq and her continuing support via her “yea” votes on giving the war-addict in the White House the key to the treasury.

Soon after Camp Casey in August, 05, I was meeting with some Hollywood people who pretended that they supported me, but really were big money donors and supporters of Hillary. I was told that the Senator was really against the war, but she was waiting for the politically correct time to come out against it. I was told that she was the best hope for the Democrats in 2008, and I should give her a break.

I don’t know who Mr. and Mrs. Hollywood and Mr. Hollywood Got Rocks thought that they were talking to. My son was used as a “soldier of Christ” in BushCo’s crusade against the world and a political pawn in such pro-war Democrat’s moves to the White House. I was disgusted and noted this in many blogs that I wrote at the time.

I supported the candidate for Senate in New York that ran a very courageous, anti-war race against Clinton: Jonathan Tasini. CODEPINK New York did amazing work dogging the Senator and her supporters everywhere that she went and outing the fact that she is a Republican in Democratic clothing. Unfortunately, the people of New York spoke and Clinton, the pro-war candidate beat out Jonathan. The conservative area that she and President Clinton moved their carpet bags to after their presidency was over had a major impact on the last elections.

I, my sister, Dede, and another Gold Star Mother, Lynn Braddach, whose son, Travis Nall was killed in Iraq in 2003, met with Sen. Clinton in DC in September of 2005. We poured our hearts and souls out to her. We cried as we told her of our sons and our fear for the people of Iraq and the escalating body count of our brave young people. She sat there stone-faced and walked out and told Sarah Ferguson, of the Village Voice, “My bottom line is that I don’t want their sons to die in vain . . . I don’t believe it’s smart to set a date for withdrawal . . . I don’t think it’s the right time to withdraw.” She may as well have slapped us in the face using Bloody George’s line and using our son’s
sacrifice to justify her war-mongering.

On Thursday, January 18th, Senator Clinton introduced a meaningless bill to put a cap on the number of soldiers that can be in Iraq set at January 1st levels. It is as weak and meaningless as the non-binding resolution and a politically safe move, since almost ¾ of the country oppose the war and oppose Bloody George. When she introduced her Senate bill last Thursday, over 1000 of our young people have come home in body bags and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis have died while she was waiting for the best political time to be semi-against the war. How many of our troops are lying in Walter Reed with devastating injuries that could have been prevented if a Senate leader like Clinton would have taken a moral, instead of political stance?

This occupation of Iraq can’t be won by being smarter — it was lost before we went in. The US, again, were big losers in a capricious military expedition with the support of Senator Clinton. She is an amazingly brilliant person and she cannot say that she was fooled, or lied to by George. We, the American public can be brilliant to, and we can’t buy that baloney.

In 2005, I was dying to support Hillary for president: finally a bright woman with experience. However, she is a champion fence sitter and politically heartless.

I, again, affirm my commitment to peace. I don’t care if it is a man or a woman; Democrat or Republican; white or black; Christian, Jew or otherwise. I will only support a candidate who is courageously and uncompromisingly committed to peace.

Hillary Clinton is not that person. She never will be. History speaks louder than words.


  1. Anonymous said,

    January 23, 2007 at 12:32

    Cindy is right! Hillary is the last person that we need as President. There probably is not a worse candidate for the American people! She will do more harm to this country than any President in history.

  2. DesertPeace said,

    January 23, 2007 at 13:22

    I’m not so sure about that Anon… you gotta be pretty bad to be worse than Dubya.

  3. Rob K said,

    January 23, 2007 at 17:48

    I am no big fan of Hillary, but I agree with you, Peace. I’m afraid democracy is a game of compromise and I’ll glady settle for Hillary if it spares us the likes of Dubya and John “Surge” McCain.

  4. DesertPeace said,

    January 23, 2007 at 18:08

    Thanks for commenting Rob…. always good to see you here.
    It’s sad that too many elections in the States were voted on the premis of ‘the lesser of the two evils’…
    Time for someone good to run.

  5. LanceThruster said,

    January 23, 2007 at 18:48

    Comments all across progressive web sites show Hillary is not their candidate of choice yet the DNC and the money interests keep promoting her as such. If the base does not like her, and her negatives are too high (from both parties), and she has not showm any backbone regarding the war or impeachment, why back her?

    It’s because the lobby would rather lose with someone they are comfortable with than win with someone with some real integrity that make shake things up too much.

    If they’re gonna pull this stuff again, I’d almost rather vote for Nader.

    I hope the early primaries do not weed out qualified candidates such as Edwards and would love to see Clark as VP.

  6. DesertPeace said,

    January 23, 2007 at 18:52

    I guess we won’t have any answers till after the primaries Lance.

%d bloggers like this: