Google’s censors: The cat is out of the bag
January 10, 2009
As our readers know, on April 24, 2008 Google stopped indexing Uruknet.info as a news source. It was the fourth time that Google discontinues indexing Uruknet. The previous times google had reinstated it following many complaints sent in by our readers. The last time there was nothing to be done: in a first moment google news wouldn’t even answer to our emails and, at last, after about ten days has answered with a series of lies.
Of course, they were only excuses.
1) The Google Team did not say which kind of complaints they received and from whom;
2) The Google Team wrote: “we weren’t able to find any stories on your site that weren’t from outside sources”. Probably The Google Team didn’t look up carefully since Uruknet publishes regularly original articles. Moreover, many articles we publish are sent us by their authors for publication and Uruknet links to their blogs and websites for fairness.
3) The Google Team wrote “We currently don’t include sites that are primarily news aggregators.” This is patently false because Google News does include a lot of websites that are primarily or exclusively news aggregators. While a few of them hide the original source, most of them openly quote the link to the original source as we do.
4) Finally, being this the fourth time just in a couple of years Google News stopped indexing Uruknet.info, we acknowledge that every single time Google gave us a different reason.
When we pointed out to the Google Team that google.news does index hundreds news aggregators, some of those even publishes (quoting the link to the original source) original articles from uruknet, google.news has called us to delation, writing us to report websites that according to us were unduely indexed, almost as if we had asked other websites to be removed and not ours to be reindexed.
Obviously, due to uselessness and to the level of baseness achieved by google, the email exchange with the Google Team was ended.
Anyway, censorship carried out by google towards uruknet wasn’t restricted to this: subsequently google.com also started to delete uruknet’s articles previously indexed.
As odd it may seem, it’s as if someone inside Google deletes indexed articles. Currently, google.com indexes 7,000 pages of uruknet.info against 130,255 indexed by yahoo (and 1,630 pages of the mirroring website uruknet.de against 23,278 indexed by yahoo ).
It even seems that google mail has blacklisted the name of uruknet: when we repeatedly tried to submit uruknet.info to Google Blog Search for inclusion we didn’t even receive the usual email from robots.
A this point, we were sure that “someone” had asked google to carry out a total censorship on uruknet: the few pages still indexed by google.com are an obvious trick used in order to disguise censorship and not making it immediately evident to any user.
Anyhow, we needed a proof, and we achieved it easily: we arranged two new websites, one in Italian and the other in English, respectively Notizie dal Medio Oriente and News from Middle East, that are in fact perfect mirrorings of uruknet, with a few graphic changes, and we put them directly on the same server where uruknet is located.
After that we requested google.news to index them and after they analysed both websites, we obtained it without the least problem. Of course when the google.news guys will read this article, they will stop indexing Notizie dal Medio Oriente and News from Middle East, but we have saved a copy of google news pages: News from Middle East on google.news and Notizie dal Medio Oriente on news.google.it .
So, it was so clear since the very first moment, all the despicable excuses pleaded by google.news for having removed uruknet were lies google came up with in order to account for the censorship obviously pressed for by someone who didn’t like our website. All we needed was to change the name of the website leaving untouched form and substance and every problem was gone.
We don’t even want to make conjectures about who may have requested google.news to ban uruknet, though, obviously, it doesn’t seem so difficult to guess which political setting could put pressure on google in order to obtain censorship of our website.
Whoever did it, actually, we have now proved that google, the main search engine in the world – or, at least some people inside the Google Team – delists websites on request, and then makes clumsy attempts to justify the censorship operation with some excuses and lies invented on the spot. It is quite clear that the gravity of this matter goes way beyond google.news’ censorship of our website. In our case, undoubtfully censorship was due to political reasons but, since this is the way google behaves, we can easily imagine that, if “duly” pressed, google may censor (and supposedly has already censored) – and, like in our case, also blacklist – websites that are unwelcome for any reason to who is powerful or important enough or has suitable instruments of pressure.
We’ll forward this text to all internet and anti-censorship organizations. In the meanwhile, we ask our readers to send us (at the following address < URUK@INTERNET-FREEDOM.ORG > ) notice about all cases of censorship carried out by google : of course we will publish them on our website.