THE QUEEN HAS LOST HER ROYAL MARBLES

Red Carpet treatment for Israeli war criminals visiting Britain…
*
Britain has amended a law that allowed for issuing arrest warrants against Israeli politicians who visit the country, British Ambassador Matthew Gould announced Thursday. Gould called opposition leader Tzipi Livni, against whom an arrest warrant was issued in 2009, and told her the Queen has signed the amendment “to ensure that the UK’s justice system can no longer be abused for political reasons.”
*
*

Britain changes law that enabled war crime charges against Israelis

Reform began after arrest warrant issued in 2009 against opposition leader Tzipi Livni; British Ambassador says change in law means it ‘can no longer be abused for political reasons.’

Britain has amended a law that allowed for issuing arrest warrants against Israeli politicians who visit the country, British Ambassador Matthew Gould announced Thursday. Gould called opposition leader Tzipi Livni, against whom an arrest warrant was issued in 2009, and told her the Queen has signed the amendment “to ensure that the UK’s justice system can no longer be abused for political reasons.”

Lawyers working with Palestinian activists in recent years have sought the arrest of senior Israeli civilian and military figures under terms of universal jurisdiction. This legal concept empowered judges to issue arrest warrants for visiting officials accused of war crimes in a foreign conflict, under the principle of universal jurisdiction which holds that some alleged crimes are so grave that they can be tried anywhere, regardless of where the offences were committed.

After the warrant was issued against Livni in 2009, Foreign Secretary David Miliband announced that Britain would no longer tolerate legal harassment of Israeli officials in that fashion.

Ambassador Gould added Thursday that the change in the law will ensure that people cannot be detained when there is no realistic chance of prosecution, while ensuring that we continue to honour our international obligations.

Livni welcomed the amendment, and told Gould that she is “pleased that the warrant issued against me opened Britain’s eyes and will put a stop to the cynical use of British legislation against IDF commanders and soldiers.”

Livni added that “real justice has been done, and it will distinguish between leaders and commanders who defend their country against terrorism, and real war criminals.”


Source

 

*

Also see THIS Ynet report

*

UK amends law that allows arrest of Israeli officials

 

Queen of England signs amendment to bill that enabled to issue arrest warrants against foreign officials, prevented IDF commanders, Israeli politicians from visiting UK. British ambassador to Israel: UK’s justice system can no longer be abused for political reasons

17 Comments

  1. Anonymous said,

    September 15, 2011 at 18:52

    Royal bullshit – now Rothschild owes her a favour!

  2. skulz fontaine said,

    September 15, 2011 at 18:56

    That photag of Lizzie the Deuce? She looks like her oars don’t quite make it to the water. Hmmm, that would explain why she’d slap the royal imprimatur on an amendment to law that negates the arrest of war criminals. In the UK of course. So there you go world, war criminals are now and forever more, welcome in the UK.
    Saddam Hussein? Too little way too late.

  3. Redpossum said,

    September 15, 2011 at 20:57

    Wow, I knew UK government was almost as rotten as our own, but I didn’t realize they’d come right out and give the Zionists a public rimjob like that.

  4. Deborah said,

    September 15, 2011 at 22:23

    I really hope this is another nail in the coffin of those inbred scumbags.

    The royals have a history of supporting the wrong side. Queenie’s Uncle Edward and his awful wife were suspected of being Nazi sympathisers and it looks they haven’t changed at all.

  5. brian said,

    September 15, 2011 at 22:49

    Political reasons? i lnmow the queen is old but is she unaware of what political crimes the Entity has committed? from grand theft, massacres(esp the King David hotel) war on Lebanon etc . We see in the Queen the power or absolute rule, and how it can be used for political reasons to deflect justice..Livni like all zionists of any party would have us believe their massacres of palestinians are not crimes but defence …

  6. September 16, 2011 at 00:46

    […] THE QUEEN HAS LOST HER ROYAL MARBLES […]

  7. September 16, 2011 at 00:57

    […] THE QUEEN HAS LOST HER ROYAL MARBLES […]

  8. rebel said,

    September 16, 2011 at 01:40

    White men speak with “forked tonque” was the comment made by red Indian 300 years ago, and still applicable today. They invade, and rape / murder in millions and still show no shame….. NOTHING NEW…

  9. Rob said,

    September 16, 2011 at 02:37

    The “royals” haven’t had any “marbles” for decades. Do what it takes to make them “commoners”, and see what happens.

  10. J Rouch said,

    September 16, 2011 at 07:37

    Why do the British allow this horrible old hag and her family of royal parasites to exist?

  11. Howard T. Lewis III said,

    September 16, 2011 at 08:02

    One of these days you’ll listen to your uncle Howard.
    The grandiose ‘world court of the world’ is dedicated to the pain inflected on the earth by the satanic forces of the Rothschild/English royal alliance soon to be replaced by Al Gore and Prince Chaaallz trying to sell ice cream to underage girls at the beach to make rent at their shared $250.00/mo. bachelor pad residence. It’s my vision for a progressive today and tomorrow.

  12. Geltmeister said,

    September 16, 2011 at 08:51

    ‘ the Queen has signed the amendment “to ensure that the UK’s justice system can no longer be abused for political reasons.” ‘

    I’m sorry, but the UK is a parliamentary democracy. The Queen has zero authority with regard to UK laws. The idea that she signs ‘amendments’ to UK law is completely wrong.

    Any change in UK law must be voted on by the House of Commons and the passed by the House of Lords. No public records of the two houses show any such amendment has been made.

    I believe this story is Israeli propaganda.

  13. Geltmeister said,

    September 16, 2011 at 09:03

    Talking of Israeli propaganda, anyone seen this? Apparently Iran was behind 911 – the proof? None of the 911 terrorists had Iranian stamps in their passports (not kidding). Read it for yourself.

    This is not yellow journalism, it is outright war propaganda.
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4120430,00.html

  14. September 16, 2011 at 10:29

    […] 15 September 2011 — Desertpeace […]

  15. Roy Tovers said,

    September 16, 2011 at 17:56

    “Why do the British allow this horrible old hag and her family of royal parasites to exist?”

    Do you think they have any say in the matter? They are just a subjected people. That’s why they are called ‘subjects’ and not ‘citizens’.

  16. Hatherstone said,

    September 17, 2011 at 01:35

    The Queen doesn’t have a say in it. It is just a traditional formality that amendments have to be given royal approval. She never refuses them or even reads them. It is just a given.

  17. butlincat said,

    September 17, 2011 at 05:50

    Hatherstone – if the queen wanted to object to signing in agreement with any proposal put in front of her she could, as what happened in the Paul Burrell or wotever his name was that they tried to prosecute over Dianas dresses, making a court case out of. She just gave a nod and presto! court case over – he walks out admonished – and so he probably should, some may say. The point is the queen CAN reject or accept anything put in front of her to sign, she doesnt neccasarily have to agree to anything….b.


%d bloggers like this: