THE TWO FACES OF TERRORISM IN ISRAEL

Palestine suddenly exists when there is a terrorist attack

Palestine suddenly exists when there is a terrorist attack

Terror is always Palestinian, even when hundreds of Palestinian civilians are killed. The name and face of Daniel Tragerman, the Israeli boy killed by mortar fire during Operation Protective Edge, were known throughout the world; even U.S. President Barack Obama knew his name. Can anyone name one child from Gaza among the hundreds killed?

In Israel, only Jewish blood shocks anyone

Killings of Palestinians by soldiers and policemen will never shock Israel. The propaganda machine will whitewash everything, and the media will be its mouthpiece.

*
IDF soldiers in the West Bank village of Awarta, June 26, 2014. Photo by AFP

IDF soldiers in the West Bank village of Awarta, June 26, 2014. Photo by AFP

There was a massacre in Jerusalem on Tuesday in which five Israelis were killed. There was a war in Gaza over the summer in which 2,200 Palestinians were killed, most of them civilians. A massacre shocks us; a war, less so. Massacres have culprits; wars don’t. Murder by ax is more appalling than murder by rifle, and far more horrendous than bombing helpless people trying to take shelter.

Terror is always Palestinian, even when hundreds of Palestinian civilians are killed. The name and face of Daniel Tragerman, the Israeli boy killed by mortar fire during Operation Protective Edge, were known throughout the world; even U.S. President Barack Obama knew his name. Can anyone name one child from Gaza among the hundreds killed?

A few hours after the attack in Jerusalem, journalist Emily Amrousi said at a conference in Eilat that the life of a single Jewish child was more important to her than the lives of thousands of Palestinian children. The audience’s response was clearly favorable; I think there was even some applause.

Afterward Amrousi tried to explain that she was referring to the way the Israeli media should cover events, which is only slightly less serious. This was during a discussion on the ridiculous question: “Is the Israeli media leftist?” Almost no one protested Amrousi’s remarks and the session continued as if nothing had happened. Amrousi’s words reflect Israel’s mood in 2014: Only Jewish blood elicits shock.

Israeli deaths touch Israeli hearts more than the deaths of others. That’s natural human solidarity. The bloody images from Jerusalem stunned every Israeli, probably every person.

But this is a society that sanctifies its dead to the point of death-worship, that wears thin the stories of the victims’ lives and deaths, whether it be in a synagogue attack or a Nepal avalanche. It’s a society preoccupied with endless commemorations in the land of monuments, services and anniversary ceremonies; a society that demands shock and condemnation after every attack, when it blames the entire world.

Precisely from such a society is one permitted to demand some attention to the Palestinian blood that is also spilled in vain; some understanding of the other side’s pain, or even a measure of empathy, which in Israel is considered treason.

But this doesn’t happen. Aside from exceptional murders and hate crimes by individuals, there is total apathy — and the obtuseness is frightening. Killings (we dare not say murders) by soldiers and policemen will never shock Israel. The propaganda machine will whitewash everything, and the media will be its mouthpiece. No one will demand condemnations. No one will express shock. Few will even consider that the pain is the same pain, that murder is murder.

How many Israelis are willing to give a thought to the parents of Yousef Shawamreh, the boy who went out to pick wild greens and was killed by an army sniper? Why is it exaggerating to be upset by, or at least give some attention to, the killing of Khalil Anati, a 10-year-old boy from the Al-Fawar refugee camp?

Why can’t we identify with the pain of bereaved father Abd al-Wahab Hammad, whose son was killed in Silwad, or with the Al-Qatari family from the Al-Amari refugee camp, two members of which were killed by soldiers within a month? Why do we reserve our horror for the synagogue and not consider these killings disturbing?

Yes, there is the test of intent. The typical Israeli argument is that soldiers, unlike terrorists, do not intend to kill. If so, then what exactly is the intent of the sniper who fires live bullets at the head or chest of a demonstrator a distance away who poses no threat? Or when he shoots a child in the back as he’s running for his life? Didn’t he intend to kill him?

The attack in Jerusalem was a horrendous crime; nothing can justify it. But the blood that flowed there is not the only blood being spilled here murderously. The degree to which it is forbidden to say that is incredible.

4 Comments

  1. R Davis said,

    November 21, 2014 at 03:11

    ACCORDING TO SEVERAL MAINSTREAM MEDIA OUTLETS:
    IN THE FAR NORTH AREA – WEST OF JERUSALEM
    Inside a Jewish Seminary – the Edmond Safdie Building.
    ( WHICH IS )
    A Jewish Educational Institution
    A Yeshiva
    ( WHICH IS A LARGE, MODERN BUILDING )

    2 Palestinians entered – freely & easily – they were armed with meat cleavers & guns – and they just walked into this – Jewish Seminary – a large modern building – and killed 4 Jewish men who were worshiping.

    I have watched the footage of the
    AFTERMATH
    AFTERMATH
    AFTERMATH
    On several main stream media news channels

    MY QUESTION IS THIS:

    1) WHERE IS THE CC FOOTAGE OF THE EVENTS LEADING UP TO THE KILLING OF THESE 4 MEN –
    According to my information ALL synagogue’s have sophisticated security systems which include electronic surveillance.

    * SO I ASK AGAIN “WHERE IS THE CC FOOTAGE OF THE 2 Palestinian assailants entering the EDMOND SAFDIE BUILDING.”

    * I ASK “WHERE IS THE CC FOOTAGE OF THE 2 PALESTINIAN ASSAILANTS MAKING THEIR WAY TO THE PRAYER AREA/ROOM.

    * I ALSO ASK “WHERE IS THE CC FOOTAGE OF THE 2 PALESTINIAN ME KILLING THE 4 JEWISH MEN PRAYING.”

    2) WHERE WHERE THE SECURITY GUARDS AT THE TIME OF THE KILLING.

    * HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THESE 2 PALESTINIANS WERE ABLE TO ENTER THE EDMOND SAFDIE BUILDING AT ALL.
    * WITH ALL THE SECURITY – BEGINNING WITH SURVEILLANCE OF THE STREET OUTSIDE LEADING INTO THE BUILDING AND TO THE PRAY ROOM.
    * HOW SOMEONE / ANYONE COULD HAVE GOTTEN IN AND WITH WEAPONS AND NOT BE SEEN AND APPREHENDED.
    * PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS TO ME.

  2. R Davis said,

    November 21, 2014 at 03:13

    YOU CAN’T JUST WALK IN THE DOOR OF THE EDMOND SAFDIE BUILDING.
    NO ONE CAN.
    NOT EVEN A JEW.

  3. November 21, 2014 at 10:39

    Daniel Tragerman ? Didn’t happen. There were no mortars, or anything else ordnance, coming out of Gaza.

    While there is plenty of cctv of detonating IAF half ton bombs at the moment of eruption, there is no equivalent in Israel showing detonating Hamas rockets, or mortars, at the moment of striking anything.

  4. November 21, 2014 at 11:27

    The story that four rabbis and another person were attacked and killed by two Palestinians in a Synagogue using meat cleavers and pistols I do not believe at all.

    They had pistols, right ? That’s all they needed.

    Reportage about meat cleavers was only to conjure in the minds of Israelis images of the Synagogue – holy of holies, turned into a bloody abattoir.

    No greater sacrilege, nor outrage, could have been wrought on the sensibilities of already sorely tried Israelis – so the planners of this hoax reasoned would be the murmurings of Israelis.

    The plan was to whip Israelis into self righteous fury, to be the impetus behind PM Netanyahu’s own ambitions of still more house demolitions on the West Bank for settlement enlargement.

    There was a picture purporting to be of the two dead Palestinian assailants; the body of the one in the foreground was dressed only in shorts and socks, but why no blood on it ? Why was his head pixelled out ?

    The other body was covered in white curtain type material, and not much could be discerned.

    Both were Israelis playing at being dead, hastily pressed into service, the plan of execution having been not too well thought out by Israeli intel.


%d bloggers like this: