SADDEST PHOTO OF THE YEAR

NO CHILD SHOULD HAVE TO FACE THE HORRORS THAT THE CHILDREN IN GAZA FACE DAILY…..

child with wounded doll in Gaza 

Courtesy of

20 Comments

  1. ahimsa09 said,

    August 3, 2009 at 18:59

    Here’s another sad picture of a gazan child:

    http://www.propheticimagery.com/Gaza%20Poem/2nd%20Crucifixion.htm

  2. William said,

    August 3, 2009 at 20:09

    Unbelievable! Absolutely unbelievable.
    The IsraHellis have inflicted so much horror on the Gazans that little girls are carrying dolls of dead babies.
    In my worst nightmares I could not have imagined something like that.

  3. Amerikagulag said,

    August 3, 2009 at 20:10

    But the Rothchilds are happy and that’s all that matters.

    And all this for a LIE!

    SADDEST PHOTO OF THE YEAR

  4. Amerikagulag said,

    August 3, 2009 at 20:11

    In fact a LOT OF LIES. 2500 years worth in fact

    http://mideastfacts.org/facts/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=34

  5. Joe Gall said,

    August 3, 2009 at 20:47

    The filth that is zio will eventually be purged from this planet.

  6. No Name said,

    August 3, 2009 at 21:06

    Hate Crimes – It should be a hate crime to call someone an antisemitic that merely opposes the foreign policy of Israeli.

  7. Ho's & The Chosen said,

    August 3, 2009 at 21:13

    This is a G-ddamned disgrace.

  8. Ho's & The Chosen said,

    August 3, 2009 at 21:14

    A G-ddamned disgrace.

  9. Tom said,

    August 3, 2009 at 21:35

    The Israelis would “justify” brutality and murder towards Palestinian children by claiming that they are future “terrorists” anyway, but the fact is that these children are being terrorized and murdered by the PRESENT terrorists, and that’s what really matters! I have to pay taxes to a government that supports these butchers who have no respect for mankind at all, and it makes me utterly sick!

  10. Dr. Zeus said,

    August 3, 2009 at 21:54

    There are worse photos than that. At least she’s alive. And many don’t get pita bread and a candy bar, or a dolly to play with. The saddest photos of the year are the children burnt with white phosphorous.

  11. wendywasp said,

    August 4, 2009 at 00:38

    God has surely damned Israel. When will the world wake up and do it?

  12. j. j. buck said,

    August 4, 2009 at 02:58

    ISRAHELL,

    YOU WILL PAY FOR THIS.

    YOU, WILL, PAY!

  13. Solus said,

    August 4, 2009 at 04:29

    Some more sad images of the most recent Israeli massacre in Gaza – profoundly traumatising just to see at a distance like this, let alone to have lived through…

  14. August 4, 2009 at 06:30

    Don’t fret – let them finally pay for this: boycott!

  15. Christine said,

    August 4, 2009 at 07:08

    I think the doll is probably meant to be a badly injured babe. In some ways the photo is not quite as bad as it may seem. I have been around girls who played with dolls, and the thing you need to know is that there is a lot a busy activity you can engage in if you have a badly wounded doll. The play activities would be tremendously satisfying to a child. Children act out what is going on in their world.

    The one pleasing thing about the situation is that the child was allowed to do what she wanted with that doll. Not all parents are comfortable about their children modifying their dolls in that kind of way. She is also allowed to walk around in public with the doll on display. This may well be more normal than it looks.

    Even so, what is happening in Gaza must be stopped.

  16. encoreppc said,

    August 4, 2009 at 07:24

    its a 2nd ‘Final Solution, ‘

  17. Ray O Hope said,

    August 4, 2009 at 13:52

    the israeli’s have been killing and robbing the palestinian people for over 60 years, as the rest of the world and the UN do nothing other than to help the israelis with arms and money, this world body is nothing more than a mafia , a crime ring run by the zionist world bank, where everything have a price.
    the palestinian people have no one to help them ( other than iran ) over come this evil, they are lift to die by the backward and savage israeli barbaric tribe.
    the arab and muslim world have sold their soul to the israeli devil , they are helping them in this blood letting , they will be next to go, israel have a big plan for them as well, you see israel wants to be a great nation , palestine is only the foot hold , they’ll be coming for jordan, syria, lebanonand the rest of the middel east, they are softening them up for the kill just as they have done in iraq, wait and see this evil army of the devil feed on the rest of the middle east and behind , as america/eu/ and israel playing good cop, bad cop with so called peace talks that gives israel more time to grow and wage one war after another, one arabic nation at a time , the israeli’s dont want peace and will never stop killing, this evil well keep on feeding on the blood of the people of the whole of the middle east, this beast must be killed.

  18. DontLookUp said,

    August 5, 2009 at 01:36

    You are right.

    They get away with it every time…..

    And they will do so again.

    While the world must equally keep condeming Israel & its atrocious army, rightfully, because the people are not their government. And Zionism is as large an unpardonable sin as genocide.

  19. Aufzuleiden said,

    August 5, 2009 at 16:13

    How many people have bothered looking at the source of the photograph? The link is posted below the image and talks about the first Hamas produced film – why? Perhaps this is an image from the film … why else would it be shown with an article about the movie?

    It just seems to me that if you are talking about a movie you would use an image from that move – that makes sense. The point of the article is to arouse interest in a specific film and to point out what is happening in that part of the world. Otherwise there would have been a caption about who, specifically, the child was and the circumstances surrounding the taking of the picture (who/what/where). Otherwise it has no context and, as such, no meaning as a photo. For all intents and purposes it could be a photo of a child taken in the slums of Bolivia or Columbia – she does look somewhat like a South American Native.

    Think about it before making her the poster child for Palestinian suffering.

    The saddest photo of the year is the one taken of the politicians sitting behind their desks, looking at the camera with unseeing eyes while their constituents die from the apathy that pours out of their offices.

    Wie viel ist aufzuleiden!

  20. August 5, 2009 at 16:30

    Yes, just picture the child to be your child or your grandchild! How’d you feel then? We are so well protected even against viewing what goes on — has been going on for 60 years — in Palestine. Our media won’t show this.

    Time line. Some 60 years ago, the Zionists, a good many not even Jews but Ashkenazim, invade Palestine, drive the natives from their homes — no compensation, no right to return — the Stern and the Irgun goons terrorizing them into running for their lives.

    THAT’S A PEOPLE WITHOUT LAND ENTERING A LAND WITHOUT PEOPLE, NON?

    Hundreds of thousands of the DISPLACED crowded into refugee camps on the West Bank. The Zionists acted much like Joshua, their role model of the Old Testament, when he conquered the Promised Land, a land no more without people than Palestine.

    In the 1967 War, they acquire / occupy more territory. Here is what a prominent Israeli has to say about that war:

    “The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us in June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical existence is only bluff, which was born and developed after the war.”

    Israeli General Matityahu Peled, Ha’aretz, 19 March 1972.

    And here another quote from one of the founding fathers:

    10. “We must do everything to insure they (the Palestinians) never do return.” Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes. “The old will die and the young will forget.” [THOSE THE PEOPLE THAT DID NOT EXIST]

    David Ben Gurion, 1948

    And another

    “How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to.” [LAND WITHOUT PEOPLE, HUH?]

    Golda Meir, Israeli Prime Minister, March 8, 1969.

    And another:

    17. “Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.”

    [So much for the land without people !!!]

    Moshe Dayan, address to the Technion, Haifa, Haaretz, April 4, 1969.

    Then they grabbed more land by building settlements in what little land the Palestinians had left.

    And they keep killing — targeted assassinations, incursions with tanks and bulldozers, shooting at anything that moves, all in the name of Israel’s right to self-defense.

    In the sacred name of self-defense, they bombed hell out of little Gaza, as though Gaza could ever have been a threat to the invaders, who boast the most deadly war machine apart from the US, Great Britain and China. White phosphorus and DU munitions employed on a defenseless Gaza population. All that from the only democracy of the Middle East.

    And now, that they have bombed Gaza to smithereenes, they won’t even let building material in for Gaza to rebuild. Israel should be doing the rebuilding and compensate Gazans for what they lost.

    Having declared the Hamas a terrorist organization they can
    their worst without fear of being called to account. It was as clever-sly a semantic move as the creation of the term “anti-semitic.” With the term “anti-semitic” they can disarm criticism of the worst barbarities they commit. They are good at the war with guns and superb at the war of semantics.