“ISRAEL DIDN’T PUSH FOR IRAQ WAR”

Image ‘Copyleft’ by Carlos Latuff

Says who??? Obviously someone NOT IN THE KNOW! In this case it was one Doug Feith, a former U.S. Undersecretary of Defense… a name that is not quite what we call a ‘household word’… for obvious
reasons.

The following was sent to me by the editors of Spidered News… it’s worth reading.

Feith’s denials of reality “Israel didn’t push for Iraq War”

by Editor

If we are to believe Doug Feith, Israel didn’t push for Iraq War. If this is true, then I must have been living in a parallel universe over the last two decades, and I only dreamt of an Israeli attack on Iraq’s nuclear power station, and Israel’s assassination of those involved with Iraq’s super-gun project.

There is a grain of truth in Feith’s comments when he said “Israelis warned that Iraq failure could undermine effort against Iran”. This is an obvious truth, but is trying to mislead the readers into thinking Israel told the US to spare Iraq and focus on Iran. In reality, Israel wanted the Iraq war to be won decisively, so that Iraq could be used as a stepping stone to attack Iran and Syria in a pincer movement since both these regimes would then be effectively surrounded by the neo-con’s colonial army of imperial occupation.

The Zionists ability to write their own history, with the complicity of the mainstream media, can no longer be maintained in the digital age when comments and articles are archived, and time stamped. The mainstream media is helped in this regard since they frequently use anonymous sources (typically government propagandists), as well as “experts” who are secretly paid by the government.

http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/Articl … 25,00.html

Doug Feith:

Former US undersecretary of defense tells Ynet he never saw evidence of Israeli pressure on America to launch Iraq War. In private conversations, Israelis warned that Iraq failure could undermine effort against Iran, he says

As background, see :

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_iraq.html and http://www.spiderednews.com/Iraq.htm
Excellent Archives about Iraq

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_israel.html and http://www.spiderednews.com/PalestineandIsrael.htm
Excellent Archives about Israel/Palestine

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/offtowar.html

WHO IS SENDING YOUR CHILDREN OFF TO DIE IN WAR?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/whois … ingto.html
WHO IS THE US CONGRESS LISTENING TO?
http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listse … 06770.html
JEWISH WRITERS CLAIM POWERFUL ZIONISTS DROVE USA INTO MID-EAST WAR FOR SAKE OF ISRAEL!

When Congressman James Moran (D-VA) told an audience that leaders of American Jewish groups were pushing America into a war with Iraq, he was denounced as an “anti-Semite” and pressured to resign. When Syndicated columnist and former Presidential candidate Pat Buchanan accused Jewish neo-conservatives and the US-Israeli lobby of pushing America into a war against Israel’s enemies, he was also widely denounced as an “anti-Semite.”

But what are we to make of the many outspoken Jewish writers, Jewish intellectuals and Jewish activists who have been warning us about the exact same thing? Should we dismiss these jews as “anti-Semites” or “self-hating Jews”? Following are some very revealing quotes from just a few of these Jewish writers and journalists.

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/080422_war.htm
What the Iraq War is about
The more likely explanation for the US invasion of Iraq is the neoconservative Bush Regime’s commitment to the defense of Israeli territorial expansion. There is no such thing as a neoconservative who is not allied with Israel. Israel hopes to steal all of the West Bank and southern Lebanon for its territorial expansion. An American colonial regime in Iraq not only buttresses Israel from attack, but also can pressure Syria and Iran from giving support to the Palestinians and Lebanese. The Iraqi war is a war for Israeli territorial expansion. Americans are dying and bleeding to death financially for Israel. Bush’s “war on terror” is a hoax that serves to cover US intervention in the Middle East in behalf of “greater Israel.”
Thanks to Peter Chamberlin for highlighting.

12 Comments

  1. Ponyboy said,

    May 15, 2008 at 00:27

    I guess they didnt push for the attack on the USS Liberty, either.

    For it is the doom of man that he forgets….

  2. hANOVER fIST said,

    May 15, 2008 at 00:54

    Doug Feith is committing what is referred to as a “limited hangout”. he is tying to reduce what the Bush Administration (and others before them!) has done from being a complete fleecing of the U.S., and a flouting of national and international law, to the level of “well, we were trying to keep the war from our shores…don’t you believe us?”

    No…I DON’T.

  3. Matt Giwer said,

    May 15, 2008 at 01:38

    In February 2003 Haaretz reported the PM, Ariel Sharon, told government officials to stop calling for a US war on Iraq because “Israel will be blamed for the war if it goes bad.” Prior to this call every Israeli official who get get an interview of a microphone, which was about all of them, was in fact calling for war on Iraq. AFTER Sharon’s statement they all ceased instantly.

    But what is more interesting about this is that Jews and Jewish organizations around the world including in the US had been calling for that war before Sharon spoke. Afterwards they stopped all around the world.

    That is prima facia evidence of being agents of Israel.

  4. The Prophet said,

    May 15, 2008 at 01:40

    It’s time we acknowledged some other unknown truths like:
    The pope is not Catholic and bears never s..t in the woods

  5. May 15, 2008 at 03:07

    Not only did the Jews and Israel push for war with Iraq but the day after the invasion began, then Israeli p.m. Sharon was calling for Syria and Iran to be “next.”

  6. George Bush said,

    May 15, 2008 at 03:41

    Americans are nothing more than ignorant livestock for Israel.

  7. Renegade Eye said,

    May 15, 2008 at 04:20

    I don’t think Israel can make the US go to any war, it doesn’t want to fight.

    The scenario is changing with Bush gone soon. The CIA released data about weaponry, that disrupted war against Iran. That move represented a big section of the ruling class, that realizes Iran and Syria are necessary, to bail US out of Iraq.

    Israel needs a two state solution, simply because the Arab birthrate, will make a Jewish state a joke. In addition Abbas has to be given something, not to look like a goof.

  8. Scarlett said,

    May 15, 2008 at 05:33

    Israel, with its spies, blackmail of US politicians, domination of election campaign financing through groups like AIPAC and pro-Israel media censorship can pretty much get the US to do anything it wants.

    The Iraq war is a prime example. The US population is overwhelmingly against this war and want us to get out of Iraq. The Democrats were swept into control of both houses based on this issue. Normally, the Democrats would have loved an opportunity to go after Republicans since the polls were clearly in their favor. Yet, they haven’t even attempted to stop Bush not just from staying in Iraq (permanently as is the plan) but from starting yet another war with Iran under false pretenses (just like Iraq). Not only that, but you have McCain (bomb, bomb, bomb Iran) and Clinton (we’ll wipe out Iran if they attack Israel) beating the war drums. Obama may not be beating the drums, but he is toeing the line b/c he knows that to be anti-war is the kiss of death.

    Look at what happened to Howard Dean. He made a comment about being more even handed in the Israeli/Palestinian situation and suddenly every media outlet is playing “the scream” 24/7. Never mind that he was yelling over a crowd and the media equipment used was designed to filter out such noises in order to capture what the speaker was saying. They couldn’t let someone who might not be 100% loyal to Israel have a chance at winning.

    That is why Clinton isn’t giving up. They are trying their best to find a way to get rid of Obama. Then, when Bush leaves, we can have someone just like him to take his place and our wars in the middle east will continue and expand. Until our economy collapses and/or WWIII starts. When the US has completely collapsed (and I’m sure Israel hopes we take Russia and China with us), they have the military might and nukes to take over the oil regions and control the world.

    So, I wish people would stop just “running the clock” with Bush. It is NOT going to get any better with the next President. The system is corrupted — not just Bush. And if by some miracle we actually got a President willing to try to get us back on the right track — he wouldn’t survive (literally) his first term.

  9. David Mende said,

    May 15, 2008 at 09:48

    The cold hard fact is, Israeli/Zionist/Neocons have taken over the Government of the United States. Note: Barack Obama’s chief of staff, David Axelrod, is a rabid Zioinist. It is clear to me, 911 was the coup d’grace of the contest. For Independant America, it is all over.

  10. crenshaw familla said,

    May 15, 2008 at 11:27

    all part of their plan for world government, globalist secret societies running all the “major” nations (banks ,media military, FEAR), playing a big Hegelian game, at ALL OF OUR EXPENSE, another “war to end all wars” and they can emerge the saviors of all the dirt they’ve built up.

  11. Greg Bacon said,

    May 15, 2008 at 11:37

    “Hey Dougie, what about these inconvenient truths? Haven’t had time to swipe them down the “Memory Hole?”

    Israel To U.S.: Don’t Delay Iraq Attack

    Sharon Government Urges Prompt Action Against Saddam

    JERUSALEM, Aug. 16, 2002

    (CBS) Israel is urging U.S. officials not to delay a military strike against Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, an aide to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said Friday.

    Israeli intelligence officials have gathered evidence that Iraq is speeding up efforts to produce biological and chemical weapons, said Sharon aide Ranaan Gissin.

    Source: CBS News

    To use the brutal words of Ranaan Gissin, an aide to then Israeli PM Ariel Sharon: “Any postponement of an attack on Iraq at this stage will serve no purpose.”

    Maybe not Israel’s purpose, but what about the rest of the civilized world?

    And this article:

    Israel Says War on Iraq Would Benefit the Region

    By James Bennet February 27, 2003 New York Times

    Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz told members of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations last week that after Iraq, the United States should generate “political, economic, diplomatic pressure” on Iran. “We have great interest in shaping the Middle East the day after” a war, he said.

    “The shock waves emerging from post-Saddam Baghdad could have wide-ranging effects in Tehran, Damascus, and in Ramallah,” Efraim Halevy, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s national security adviser, said in a speech in Munich this month.

    Until recently, Mr. Halevy was the chief of the Mossad, Israel’s spy agency. He said, “We have hopes of greater stability, greater enhanced confidence from the Persian Gulf to the Atlantic shores of Morocco.”

    Israelis have also suggested that that an Iraq war may salvage their economy and even prompt the opposition Labor Party to join Mr. Sharon’s coalition in a new government of national unity.

    Availabe at Global Policy.org

    And yes, like David Mende pointed out, Americans are no longer in control of their country.

    The coup d’état was a two-part affair. First part was the stealing of the 2000 election by Bush/Cheney operatives, then the coronation of Bush by the Supreme Court.

    The final shot to the head was on 9/11.

  12. July 26, 2008 at 09:02

    The meeting of two personalites is like the contact of two chemical substances. If there is any reaction, both are transformed.CarlGustavJungCarl Gustav Jung