ISRAEL’S NUCLEAR BOMBS ARE THE PROBLEM IN THE MIDDLE EAST

Israel’s nuclear bombs are the problem in the Middle East

By Khalid Amayreh

Once again, Israel is pushing the Middle East to the brink of war, with predictably disastrous consequences. In recent days, Israeli leaders markedly escalated their war of words against Iran. A leading Israeli cabinet minister was quoted on Friday, 6 June as saying, “attacking Iran will be unavoidable.”

Similarly, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, just back from a meeting with George W. Bush in Washington, sounded almost euphoric when he spoke of an “American-Israeli consensus on the need to stop Iran’s nuclear program by whatever means necessary.”

Needless to say, an Israeli or American-Israeli attack on Iran would be a blatant and unprovoked aggression on a sovereign nation. It would also plunge the world into an unpredictable phase of violence and turbulence, with deep and far-reaching ramifications.

Iran, although hostile to Israel because of the latter’s Nazi-like occupation of Palestine and oppression of the Palestinian people, has never attacked Israel.

True, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad often makes stupid and irresponsible rhetorical remarks about wiping Israel off the map, thus giving the Zionist regime ample hasbara ammunition to incite and blackmail the West into boycotting and isolating the Iranian republic. However, Ahmadinejad himself and other Iranian officials have made it abundantly clear that Iran is not against Jews or Judaism, but rather against Zionism, an inherently racist and manifestly criminal ideology based on mass murder and ethnic cleansing.

This seems a plausible explanation because if Ahmadinejad were truly hostile to Jews or Judaism, let alone if he harbored genocidal designs against the Jewish people, as the Zionist propaganda machine keeps telling us, he would start with tens of thousands of Iranian Jewish citizens who enjoy religious and civil freedoms and are represented in the Iranian parliament.

Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister said “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” This is exactly the maxim being adopted by Zionist leaders who are spreading lies, disinformation and half-truths about Iran in order to get the madman in Washington D.C. and his gang of neocons and war criminals to attack another Muslim country on Israel’s behalf.

Unlike most Arab states in the region, Iran is a dignified country that respects itself and values its independence. It adamantly refuses to be at America’s beck and call and rejects the western rationale that the Nazi holocaust against Jews during WWII justifies the dispossession and destruction of the Palestinian people at the hands of Zionist Jews.

Iran, despite all the disinformation to the contrary, is not really against peace between Israel and the Palestinian people. However, Iran, mainly because of moral considerations, can’t accept the perpetuation of Palestinian suffering and dispossession through the creation of a deformed and truncated Palestinian “state” on less than 20% of the Palestinian homeland while allowing the apartheid Israeli regime to keep the rest of the spoils of theft. In other words, Iran says that ethnic cleansing must never be allowed to triumph.

Well, isn’t that compatible with the views of most men and women of honesty and conscience all over the globe?

Nonetheless, the main Israeli motive behind its hostility to Iran stems from Israeli worries that a technologically advanced and militarily strong Iran might pose a credible challenge to Israel’s strategic supremacy in the region.

Israel is believed to possess hundreds of nuclear warheads, ready with delivery systems, in addition to a huge arsenal of state-of-the-art of American weapons of death. Israel also tightly controls American politics, policies, political parties and media, especially the so-called agenda-setters.

Indeed, one exaggerates very little by saying that the United States of America is subservient to Israel and that American politicians, including members of Congress and the Senate as well as presidential candidates are more answerable to the Jewish lobby, especially AIPAC, than they are to their own American constituents.

The recent speech by the Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama during AIPAC’s convention last week is very telling. It proves once again that the international Zionist cartel, of which AIPAC constitutes the American chapter, tightly controls the American political discourse and that any American politician who dares speak his or her mind about Israel’s slow-motion genocide of Palestinians or more recently about America’s relations with the Muslim world, will be committing political suicide.

So, how can an essentially third world country like Iran possibly pose a real threat to nuclear Israel that is backed by the only superpower in the world, its guardian-ally, the United States?

Besides, Iran has a natural right to harness nuclear technology, even for military purposes. Indeed, if Israel had the right to possess and stockpile hundreds of nuclear warheads, that are being trained at Muslim cities such as Cairo, Istanbul, Tehran and Damascus and probably Mecca and Medina as well, why on earth would Muslim states such as Iran, Egypt and Saudi Arabia not have such a right?

After all, are Jewish nuclear bombs kosher? Are they altruistic? Are they innocuous?

I am not and will never be a fan of nuclear weapons or any other weapons of mass destruction. And I think the invention of these ugly tools of mass extinction represented the lowest point in human morality if only because these weapons are capable of annihilating the human race.

Having said that, however, I believe that a situation where certain states are allowed to possess the nuclear technology (and nuclear weapons) while others are not, is inherently unjust and unacceptable.

This situation allows criminal states like Israel to coerce and bully other states and other peoples and even blackmail the entire world. It allows Israel to bomb Tunis, Baghdad, Syria and threaten to bomb the Egyptian Aswan Dam and then tell the helpless victims “hit me back if you dare.”

Hence, Israel must bring itself to understand that this situation where Israel keeps bullying hundreds of millions of Muslims by brandishing her nuclear bombs in their faces and telling them “hit me back if you dare” is intolerable and unacceptable, to say the least.

Muslims around the world are watching helplessly the despicable treatment Israel is meting out to the Palestinians. And in their hearts and minds they realize that if they don’t acquire military strength, or at least enough of it to deter Israel’s genocidal whims, their turn will eventually come because Israel’s ambitions go far beyond Gaza and the West Bank.

Don’t tell me I am exaggerating. A state that dropped 3 million cluster bomblets on Lebanon two years ago is capable of carrying out the unthinkable, especially in light of the fact that the main capitals of Europe and North America are more or less Israeli-occupied territories.

This is a message that not only Iran ought to understand and internalize. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and even Turkey must also get busy.

In a jungle where strength respects strength, one has to be a tiger, a fox or a venomous cunning snake in order to survive.

10 Comments

  1. Tikkun said,

    June 7, 2008 at 16:12

    Great artcile, EXCEPT you are perpetuating the myth that Ahmedinijad threatened to “wipe Israel off the map.” He simply NEVER said this, and this myth has been debunked repeatedly, including on antiwar.com:

    http://www.antiwar.com/orig/norouzi.php?articleid=11025

  2. jaglkavak said,

    June 7, 2008 at 19:59

    I was going to say the same.

  3. Frank said,

    June 8, 2008 at 06:36

    Me too, it almost made me stop reading! That quote is pure Zionist propaganda!

  4. Frank said,

    June 8, 2008 at 19:04

    I don’t get it: Robert Gates, Olmert when he was in Germany, Jimmy Carter, Vannunu all made it very clear that Israël has nukes, but no one thinks about asking them to let inspectors in to see what’s going on under Dimona! All the fuss is about Iran’s “supposed” nuclear program while Israël’s already got them, threatened to attack Iran and talk about starting wars with all its neighbors! A double standard that makes me kind of sick…

  5. June 8, 2008 at 23:19

    CALEA was the biggest mistake and blunder of this Congress’ national career, and is the largest reason for the obviously deliberate gagging of Sibel Edmonds from telling her story.

    http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/12/18/224826.shtml

    CALEA was an act supposedly passed by Congress to improve law enforcement capabilities. It was passed through immense pressure from the Israel lobby and other firms like the RAND Corporation, without so much as a fight against it by the millions of concerned citizens.

    On paper CALEA was supposed to enhance our abilities to run our country. It was supposed to enhance and protect our national security. In reality, CALEA destroyed our national security by creating a grevious loophole inside the telphone systems of law enforcement and civilians in the United States.
    The loophole, allowed corporations in Israel as well as Turkey and the Israeli government to wiretap virtually all our phones. Our conversations, live and recorded for the Israeli government.

    On their direction, Zionists of all type including Melek Can Dickerson were able to blackmail US officials and diplomats with some of the worst things hiding in their closet. And US citizens as well. So flawless was the CALEA eaves-dropping system, they were able to send death squads into Lebanon, America and elsewhere and hunt down critics of Zionist policies.

    I’m talking almost utter complete sabatoge of our ability to defend ourselves. Authorities unable to defend their families, because when they called for backup their supervisors ran for the hills as their personal life was compromised.

    You want to talk about virtually abominable crimes. CALEA wrecked our national security and many investigations, including of congress.

    http://letsibeledmondsspeak.blogspot.com

    And we allowed this ‘LAW’ supported by the lobby, to do what it has and we sat by and allowed everything else to destroy this woman as well.

  6. June 9, 2008 at 11:36

    […] 9, 2008 By Khalid Amayreh ∙ Palestine Think Tank via DesertPeace ∙ June 7, […]

  7. June 11, 2008 at 07:06

    […] to say, an Israeli or American-Israeli attack on Iran would be a blatant and unprovoked aggression on a sovereign nation. It would also plunge the world into an unpredictable phase of violence and […]

  8. Kevin said,

    June 22, 2008 at 22:41

    THE REASON THERE ARE PROBLEMS IN THE MIDDLE EAST ARE NOT THE FAULTS OF ONE COUNTRY ALONE. One country does not start a war for no reason. You cannot stop problems by creating blame rather you can only create them. This is on of the sole causes of the problems in the middle east. If you want a true reasoning to the problems you must look further than your pre determined views on the world. Presenting fact after fact is no way to solve problems. You can make a compelling argument but so can the other side. Here is a response to your entire article: Iran is an unstable country in an unstable place in the world; they are not ready for nuclear weapons; Israel has stockpiled nuclear weapons due to the Holocaust for their own protection. They should have nuclear weapons because in an area of the world as unstable and biased as the middle east you cannot possibly hope to co-exist without conflict. It has been this way since man has existed. There respond to that. But you see, all we are doing is arguing for blame. You can argue for either side but it won’t get you anywhere. You need to take an unbiased approach and look at both sides to solve problems. It has been this way throughout history. AND WHEN TO SIDES ARE AS HIGH STRUNG AS ISRAEL AND IRAN COMPROMISE WILL NOT WORK AND THE ONLY SOLUTION IS THE ARMED CONFLICT. IT HAS BEEN REPEATED THROUGHOUT HISTORY. So throwing blame around will not do anything. Not to be racist by any means because i am not of israeli or iranian or any other middle eastern descent I am going to go ahead and guess that your have some middle eastern muslim background. Which is 100 % fine but you can’t solve a problem like that. If it was Iran with the nukes I’m sure this article would be titled, “Iran’s Nuclear Bombs a Blessing for the Middle East.” remember..UNBIASED..only way

  9. Kevin said,

    June 22, 2008 at 22:43

    just wanted to edit one part of my response, i meant to say after which is 100% fine but you can’t solve a problem like that, i meant to say you can’t solve a problem with pre determined views. the other way sounds kind of racist.

  10. October 15, 2008 at 08:15

    […] to say, an Israeli or American-Israeli attack on Iran would be a blatant and unprovoked aggression on a sovereign nation. It would also plunge the world into an unpredictable phase of violence and […]