ANOTHER ISRAELI NUCLEAR ‘WHISTLEBLOWER’

Whistleblower of Dimona

 

 

One can only wonder if this man will suffer the same fate as Mordechei Vanunu for bringing the truth to the fold…..
 
 
Ex-nuclear reactor staffer says forced to drink uranium
By Yossi Melman
 
 
 
Workers at the nuclear reactor facility in Dimona were made to volunteer to drink uranium in 1998 as part of an experiment, according to a lawsuit filed four months ago in the Be’er Sheva Labor Tribunal by a former worker at the facility.

The experiment was allegedly carried out without obtaining written consent from the workers or warning them of risks or side effects, as required by the Declaration of Helsinki on human experimentation.

The Israel Atomic Energy Commission said in a statement that the Dimona facility “has the safety and health of its workers as its highest priority.”

The commission statement added that the amount of uranium the Dimona staffers drank in the experiment (100 mirograms) was less than the amount Be’er Sheva residents drink from their taps in one month.

The worker who submitted the lawsuit, Julius Malick, recently retired after he said he was threatened by the former director of the facility, Yitzhak Gurevich, and the director of human resources, Gary Amal, that if he did not retire he would be fired.

Malick is suing the Dimona facility for a total of NIS 1.8 million in compensation. According to the suit, Malick was “asked by his superiors to take part in an experiment on five workers. In the framework of the experiment, Mr. Malick and the other workers drank uranium. The experiment was conducted without medical supervision and no explanation was given as to the health risks to participants. Mr. Malick, out of fear for his livelihood and future in the department, agreed to the demand that he participate.”

Malick, who worked at the Dimona reactor for 15 years before retiring in 2008, received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in chemistry at Bar-Ilan University. He has another degree, in industrial engineering and management, from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Be’er Sheva.

The lawsuit also notes that, while the workers did not receive the results of the experiment, an article about it appeared in the scientific journal Health Physics. According to the suit, the article, written by a number of researchers – headed by Drs. Zeev Karpas and Avi Lorber, the directors of the Dimona facility’s analytical chemistry lab – included the subjects’ names without their permission.

The subjects were given grape or grapefruit juice containing uranium to drink and were then asked for a urine sample, which was then analyzed to determine how uranium is excreted from the body through urine. The researchers said it was not supposed to be dangerous, Malick told his lawyer, Alexander Spinrad. “Lorber and Karpas said that even they took part in the experiment themselves, although to this day it’s not clear to me whether they actually did. Afterward co-workers to whom I told this said I was stupid for drinking it and they wouldn’t have agreed under any circumstances to do it,” Malick also told his lawyer.

Malick, a chemist, also said that a long time after the experiment, Lorber told him it was his and Karpas’ private project. “That’s ridiculous, of course, because the article listed other partners, whose names appear under their names and listed as workers of the Dimona facility,” Malick said.

Malick also said he once complained that no records were being kept and Karpas “joked with me and said I was making a tempest in a teapot.” The suit also states that his superiors never recorded his participation in the experiment in his medical records.

The suit describes a work accident in August of 1998, in which Malick sustained a burn on his hand as a result of contact with small amounts of uranium and other materials. Malick said he received poor treatment, and that he discovered by chance that the materials to which he had been exposed in the accident were not identified in the medical report. Malick told his lawyer he believed this type of maltreatment was systematic, and the suit alludes as much.

The lawsuit also states that Malick, in an internal memo to the safety department at the Dimona reactor, warned that workers who had been exposed in an accident to radioactive materials had not received suitable medical treatment. His first position at the Dimona reactor was in the analytical chemistry lab, where his job, among other things, was to evaluate possible damage to workers exposed to hazardous materials.

In the early years, Malick’s superiors highly praised his work. However, Malick claims that he was later branded as a troublemaker when he tried to improve the level of safety and medical service at the plant. He was subsequently transferred to other positions where his skills could not be put to good use, the lawsuit states, and finally he resigned under threat of dismissal. After he resigned, Malick says he was forced to sign an agreement that discriminates against him relative to other pensioners of the facility.

Malick declined to be interviewed for this article out of concern over harassment by his former employers through the plant’s security officers and the head of the security department in the Defense Ministry, which is responsible for security of information and the reactor. However, he confirmed to Haaretz that he had filed the lawsuit.

  

10 Comments

  1. August 17, 2009 at 09:01

    […] This post was Twitted by palestinian […]

  2. Aufzuleiden said,

    August 17, 2009 at 15:22

    I don’t know but I find this story somewhat difficult to swallow … pun intended. First of all, if someone were made to drink pure Uranium in 1998 the probabilities of their having manifested some severe cellular damage is not only likely, it is scientifically impossible to not have happened. On the other hand, isotopes that have been derived FROM Uranium – I cannot name such as I only know of nuclear isotopes, not the myriad names of said things – are much less radioactive and are often used as part of the diagnostic process in medicine because of their ability to be seen in high contrast X-rays and other radiological procedures.

    The idea of having someone drink pure uranium is almost too sensational even for the fanatical minds operating within the Zionist state – especially when you consider the fact that uranium is extraordinarily expensive and would be a very costly way of poisoning someone.

    Perhaps Haaretz should have done a bit more digging into the possibilities of truth before making this report. If it sounds too absurd to be true there may be a reason for that ….

    Wie viel ist aufzuleiden!

  3. Ivy said,

    August 17, 2009 at 16:13

    I’ll bet they were actually being tested for drugs. These people were scammed. Hah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-hah!!!

  4. David said,

    August 17, 2009 at 16:39

    Hard to swallow? its a matter of public record.

    Karpas Z, et al. Uptake of ingested uranium after low “acute intake”. Health Phys. 1998 Mar;74(3):337-45.

    …five volunteers with “normal” levels (5-15 ng L(-1)) of uranium in urine ingested a grapefruit drink spiked with 100 microg of uranium (235U/238U = 0.245%) as uranyl nitrate, and the level of uranium in their urine after ingestion was monitored…

  5. David said,

    August 17, 2009 at 16:40

    search “PMID: 9482599”

  6. andrew said,

    August 17, 2009 at 17:01

    well the man was stupid enough to drink it no one forced him or the others,what would you do if you boss said hey drink this is got uranium in it i bet the answer would be no .the Stupidity of some people amazes me .

  7. Carl M said,

    August 17, 2009 at 20:06

    If you drink uranium you’ll get atomic-ache…

  8. Uranus said,

    August 17, 2009 at 22:10

    “were made to volunteer”

    How is that possible? If you’re “made to” do something, you’re not volunteering!

  9. clockwerk said,

    August 18, 2009 at 12:07

    the israelis are gona send him to US and blow him up atomic style and blame it on AlQaeda.

  10. Aufzuleiden said,

    August 20, 2009 at 18:13

    Wow, facts to prove my point – thank you –
    After searching for ‘PMID: 9482599’ I found several sites, including the following – which proved my theory about the ingestion of isotopes rather than undiluted uranium. Remember – isotopes are used everyday in the treatment and diagnosis of medical cases.

    “To simulate low “acute intake,” five volunteers with “normal” levels (5-15 ng L(-1)) of uranium in urine ingested a grapefruit drink spiked with 100 microg of uranium (235U/238U = 0.245%) as uranyl nitrate, and the level of uranium
    in their urine after ingestion was monitored.” from http://www.nextbio.com/b/search/article.nb?id=9482599

    Now, if people bothered to READ the materials that they are so quick to use to defend the ‘horrors’ of these evil men, they would see that this was, in fact, an entirely different story. Ingesting an isotope is certainly not the same thing as ingesting uranium.

    Uranyl nitrate – the isotope used – http://www.find-health-articles.com/rec_pub_9482599-uptake-ingested-uranium-low-acute-intake.htm

    Oh, I could go on … but, the truth is so boring sometimes …

    Wie viel ist aufzuleiden!