OBAMA CAVES TO ISRAELI PRESSURE ~~ WE ALL LOSE WHEN AIPAC WINS

Yesterday’s Headlines

“Israel to consider attacking Iran”

Israel should “seriously consider” a military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities in the aftermath of the framework agreement reached between Tehran and western powers Thursday, said Professor Efraim Inbar, who heads the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. Inbar added the deal had realized Israel’s worst fears by leaving Iran’s nuclear program essentially intact.

Full Report HERE

6a017d41fbc1a2970c01901be5db34970b

And Today’s

“It has been personally difficult for me to hear … expressions that somehow … this administration has not done everything it could to look out for Israel’s interest,” he said, but insisted that the agreement with Iran was the most effective measure possible.

Obama: If anybody messes with Israel, America will be there

President says rift with Israel pained him on a personal level, maintains Iran will not get a nuclear weapon while he is in power.

US President Barack Obama sought to allay Israeli fears over the agreement the US and other world powers have reached with Iran on its nuclear program, telling the New York Times on Sunday that “if anybody messes with Israel, America will be there.”

The president’s comments come in his seventh year in office and days after the tentative agreement to curb Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The framework cleared the way for negotiators to work out technical details ahead of a June 30 deadline for a final deal.

“I have to respect the fears that the Israeli people have,” Obama said, “and I understand that Prime Minister (Benjamin) Netanyahu is expressing the deep-rooted concerns that a lot of the Israeli population feel about this, but what I can say to them is: Number one, this is our best bet by far to make sure Iran doesn’t get a nuclear weapon, and number two, what we will be doing even as we enter into this deal is sending a very clear message to the Iranians and to the entire region that if anybody messes with Israel, America will be there.”

Netanyahu has repeatedly warned that the deal endangers Israel’s existence, and has listed the issues he believes would turn a “bad deal” into a “good deal”, which would roll back Iran’s nuclear capabilities to a greater extent.

Obama acknowledged that his pursuit of diplomacy with Tehran has caused a strain between the two states, but that the he remains committed to Israel’s security. He maintained that the agreement with Iran was a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to see whether or not we can at least take the nuclear issue off the table.”

“Now, what you might hear from Prime Minister Netanyahu, which I respect, is the notion, ‘Look, Israel is more vulnerable. We don’t have the luxury of testing these propositions the way you do,’ and I completely understand that,” Obama said.

“But what I would say to them is that not only am I absolutely committed to making sure that they (Israel) maintain their qualitative military edge … what I’m willing to do is to make the kinds of commitments that would give everybody in the neighborhood, including Iran, a clarity that if Israel were to be attacked by any state, that we would stand by them.”

The president told the Times that the rift with Israel and accusations that he has sold out the country had pained him greatly.

“It has been personally difficult for me to hear … expressions that somehow … this administration has not done everything it could to look out for Israel’s interest,” he said, but insisted that the agreement with Iran was the most effective measure possible.

“What I would say to the Israeli people is … that there is no formula, there is no option, to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon that will be more effective than the diplomatic initiative and framework that we put forward — and that’s demonstrable.”

The president is casting the Iran talks as part of a broader foreign policy doctrine that sees American power as a safeguard that gives him the ability to take calculated risks.

Obama argued that successful negotiations presented the most effective way to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, but insisted he would keep all options on the table if Tehran were to violate the terms.

“I’ve been very clear that Iran will not get a nuclear weapon on my watch, and I think they should understand that we mean it,” Obama said. “But I say that hoping that we can conclude this diplomatic arrangement — and that it ushers a new era in US-Iranian relations — and, just as importantly, over time, a new era in Iranian relations with its neighbors.”

The president said there are many details that still need to be worked out with the Iranians and cautioned that there would be “real political difficulties” in implementing an agreement in both countries. He reiterated his opposition to a legislation that would give the US Congress final say in approving or rejecting a deal, but said he hoped to find a path to allow Congress to “express itself.”

The White House plans an aggressive campaign to sell the deal to Congress, as well as to skeptical Arab allies who worry about Iran’s destabilizing activity in the region. The president has invited leaders of six Gulf nations to Washington this spring and said he wanted to “formalize” US assistance.

On the substance of the Iran framework agreement, Obama outlined more specifics of how the US would seek to verify that Tehran wasn’t cheating. He said there would be an “international mechanism” that would assess whether there needed to be an inspection at a suspicious site and could overrule Iranian objections.

The nuclear talks have marked a remarkable shift in the frozen relationship between the U.S. and Iran. It has become normal for officials from both countries to communicate and hold face-to-face meetings. Obama is yet to meet with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, though they did speak on the phone. He has also exchanged letters with Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Obama said the letters include “a lot of reminders of what he perceives as past grievances against Iran.” But he said the concessions Khamenei allowed his negotiators to make in the nuclear talks suggests that “he does realize that the sanctions regime that we put together was weakening Iran over the long term, and that if in fact he wanted to see Iran re-enter the community of nations, then there were going to have to be changes.”

Source

 

bs-010
Also see Philip Weiss’ Report on Mondoweiss

So Netanyahu can turn up or turn down the volume on Capitol Hill at will, and the president will be responsive? This may be a true assumption: we all know Netanyahu can get standing ovations at will on the Hill. But shouldn’t this power be addressed? When I watch the networks and the cables, this power is only occasionally hinted at, and never described with the outrage it deserves. 

*

NYT’ describes Congress as Netanyahu’s wind-up toy


6 Comments

  1. SpideyPeter said,

    April 6, 2015 at 10:35

    Reblogged this on penelopap.

  2. joekano76 said,

    April 6, 2015 at 13:24

    Reblogged this on TheFlippinTruth.

  3. McGannahan Skyjellyfetti said,

    April 6, 2015 at 19:42

    Israel is not our friend, Iran is not our enemy.

  4. lolathecur said,

    April 6, 2015 at 20:48

    ZOG!!!

  5. Mike K. said,

    April 7, 2015 at 15:19

    Netanyahu has been warning that Iran was a couple years or less away…for well over 20 years. He was likely involved in a smuggling ring himself. He lied about an Iraqi nuke program before.Congress. can I be blunt – does a heavily Jewish and Zionist media explain in large part why Americans dont know this?

    The nuclear issue is a ruse, ISIS is a Salafist and Zionist golem, and the wars will never, ever end so long as we cant discuss disproportionate Jewish media and political power – because that power allows the Jewish Likudnik right to have the same outsized influence 2 million voters for.Bibi have over a 98% non-Jewish land of.320 million. Sorry to be harsh, but Jewish power per se, is both obviously disproportionate, and is what allows ‘Zionists’ to control and warp the message.

  6. R Davis said,

    April 8, 2015 at 13:13

    IF ISRAEL ATTACKS IRAN IT WILL BE WITH THE CONSENT OF THE IRANI GOVERNMENT
    NOT EVEN A DUMMY LIKE NETANYAHU IS STUPID ENOUGH TO ATTACK A LARGE & WELL EQUIPED NATION LIKE IRAN
    THE 6 DAY WAS WAS A PANTOMIME
    IN REALITY EGYPT ALONE COULD HAVE WIPED ISRAEL OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH
    AND AMERICA WOULD HAVE SIGHED WITH RELIEF AT HAVING THE THORN REMOVED FROM THEIR SIDE.
    AMERICA LOVED THE OIL MUCH MORE THAN ISRAEL
    AND THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN LESS PROFIT TO SHARE
    SO WHY DIDEN’T THE ARAB NATIONS DO THE US A BIG FAVOR AND DISPOSE OF ISRAEL
    THE 6 DAY WAS WAS A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY
    THEY ARE ALL IN BED TOGETHER & THEIR VICTIMS ARE THE PEOPLE


%d bloggers like this: