By Mel Frykberg
QALANDIA, West Bank, – The future of East Jerusalem and of Palestinian access to it has again been brought under the spotlight.
Thousands of Palestinians were turned away at West Bank checkpoints leading into Jerusalem by Israeli security forces as they tried to attend Friday Ramadan prayers at Al-Aqsa Mosque.
IPS witnessed dozens of heavily armed Israeli soldiers and police cordoning off the Qalandia border crossing south of Ramallah, and preventing hundreds of Palestinians from crossing through.
Women wept and elderly men argued with law enforcement officers. Several scuffles broke out, and a number of young men were beaten and arrested as they tried to force their way through the metal barriers.
The first Friday of Ramadan, Islam’s holy month when Muslims fast from dawn to dusk, is one of the holiest days of the period. Praying at Al-Aqsa Mosque, Islam’s third holiest site, is considered a religious duty for all Muslims.
While thousands of Palestinians from elsewhere, mostly children, women over 45 and men over 50 made it to Jerusalem, the vast majority of the West Bank and Gaza’s population of nearly four million people are forbidden by the Israeli authorities from travelling there.
This year many Palestinians from the occupied territories didn’t even bother trying to get to Jerusalem.
Nevertheless, Israel’s policy has caused immense anger. “East Jerusalem has cultural, religious, educational, business and family importance for Palestinians,” Dr. Adnan Husseini, Palestinian Authority (PA) minister responsible for East Jerusalem told IPS.
“Without East Jerusalem as our capital there will be no Palestinian state and without a Palestinian state there will be no peace process. Without a peace process there will be no regional stability. No Arab or Muslim country will accept Israel’s continued occupation of East Jerusalem,” says Husseini.
Israel annexed East Jerusalem following the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, a move not recognised by the international community, which considers East Jerusalem a part of the Palestinian West Bank.
Palestinian apprehensions about their rights to the eastern sector of Jerusalem have been raised once again as it appears the U.S. might be caving in to Israeli intransigence.
U.S. State Department officials have acknowledged that a compromise from their previous firm stance on settlements laid out by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton may be necessary due to the inflexibility shown by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in recent talks with U.S. Middle East envoy George Mitchell in London.
A statement released by a U.S. State Department spokesman suggests that President Barack Obama could be easing pressure on Israel to cease settlement expansion and building in East Jerusalem.
P.J. Crowley said that the administration would be showing flexibility on “pre- conditions for all parties involved in Middle East peace negotiations.
“We put forward our ideas, publicly and privately, about what it will take for negotiations to be restarted, but ultimately it’ll be up to the parties themselves, with our help, to determine whether that threshold has been met,” he said.
Up until this statement the U.S. and the EU have repeated unequivocally that Israel is obliged to cease its settlement expansion and building in East Jerusalem as this prejudices a future settlement on the city and the peace process itself.
“The statements coming from the U.S. administration are ambiguous and we are concerned. We are waiting to be informed personally by the American administration if there has been a change in their policy. We don’t believe the U.S. has the right to negotiate away our rights to East Jerusalem,” Husseini told IPS.
“However, if Israel continues to build settlements in East Jerusalem, then the matter has to be handed over to the UN Security Council and sanctions placed on Israel. Why should we continue to negotiate with Israel if it continues to take our land?”
Prof. Moshe Maoz from Jerusalem’s Hebrew University says it is too early to say whether there has been an about turn by the U.S.
“The language is very ambiguous but it is very worrying at the same time. I hope that Obama is not giving in to Netanyahu. This would be a disaster for all concerned, both Israelis and Palestinians. What is needed now is for the U.S. to increase pressure on Israel, not reduce it,” Maoz told IPS.
“I think it could be a tactical move on the part of the Americans. They are aware that the settlement issue is stalling peace talks. There are rumours that Obama has a settlement plan in the pipeline which could involve final borders between Israel and a future Palestinian state.
“If this is true then I think the U.S. could come back to the issue of a settlement freeze in East Jerusalem at a later stage. One of Obama’s former Mideast advisors Rashid Khalidi is from East Jerusalem, so I’m sure the President is well aware of the facts on the ground.”
Meanwhile, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul-Gheit told reporters in Stockholm last Friday that East Jerusalem is Arab “and it will continue to be so.” He said the Arab world expects the area to be included in a moratorium on Israeli settlements.
Desertpeace 
THE PRAYER NAZIS « Desertpeace | arablives said,
September 1, 2009 at 08:21
[…] here to see the original: THE PRAYER NAZIS « Desertpeace Share and […]
Aufzuleiden said,
September 1, 2009 at 14:57
Quite frankly, you should have left out the part about ‘Seinfeld’ – it does nothing to enhance the plight of the Palestinians in this matter and might, perhaps, undermine your credibility with those who believe – as I do – that the sitcom that was so outrageously successful was really a vehicle for some of the most racist, Antisemitic, sexist, stereotypical, stigmatizing tripe to have been broadcast in the history of television. Every time I saw a scene from that show I was amazed at how bad it was, how incredibly insensitive the humour was, and how unfunny the ‘comedy’ happened to be that everyone else seemed to be laughing over.
Seinfeld exemplifies the mystery that I have never understood as to how a Jew can – with the historical background that we have – end up being an insensitive, racist mamzer that feels it necessary to denigrate others rather than doing something to build them up. It is a form, perhaps, of ‘schadenfreude’, where we take pleasure in the suffering of others – a particularly obscene gesture when one considers the background of the Jews.
Which brings me to the Al-Aqsa Mosque. To deny Muslims access to this place at anytime is a gross violation of human decency – something that Israel obviously knows nothing of – but to do so during the times of Ramadan is an act of pure, unadulterated, spite; calculated to cause the maximum amount of distress amongst the faithful who have struggled to make their pilgrimage.
You cannot tell me that the Jews do not know that one of the Islam’s fundamental beliefs centre around pilgrimage: it is one of the Five Pillars of Faith and cannot be separated from their beliefs. To deny believers in that area the right to travel to the Al-Aqsa Mosque, which is believed to be the site where Muhammad was taken up to heaven, is more than an attack on the people, it is an affront to their spiritual beliefs. This is a stupid act that is more likely to trigger a response from fanatic extremists than a violent attack would have.
Had Israel dropped bombs on a civilian target during Ramadan that would have elicited outrage from many, but by denying this lawful pilgrimage by Muslims to a site that is revered by Muslims around the world, the Israelis are courting the wrath of fundamentalist fanatics throughout the world; people who do not think rationally in the first place and would be more than happy to add their own deaths in the pursuit of bringing glory to Allah through the cleansing of these infidels. That is exactly what the Israelis have demonstrated themselves to be by closing off the Temple Mount to the Muslims – infidels of the worst kind (not in my book – but to those who think in those terms).
To someone who is not balanced – to someone who believes that there is only one way, and Allah only allows for that way to be cleansed through the spilled blood of His enemies, well – you begin to see a problem, don’t you? It has nothing to do with soup, does it? Dancing for your soup won’t stop the fanatics when they decide to blow themselves up in the market place to demonstrate what they think of Israel and its ‘degenerate’ infidel population.
I pray that I am wrong about this – that there will not be a response of violence that kills innocent lives – but the shortsightedness of the Israel forces does not give me much hope in this matter and I fear that reprisals are the least that they need to worry about.
Steel yourself, Jerusalem, steel yourself against the thunderous wrath that is about to befall you for your leaders have betrayed you; you have been betrayed by those sworn to protect you. Those who have sworn to be guarding your gates have invited an enemy to come in amongst you and kill you like a thief in the night: your leaders have killed you with the lies of their lips.
… well, as for me – I’d avoid public areas, buses, markets and the like for the next few days – just in case. As I said – I hope and pray that I’m wrong. Really.
Wie viel ist aufzuleiden!