JASON ALEXANDER; FROM FUNNY GUY TO PEACEMAKER

 1_hh
*
Though we may be actors in an important drama, we do know the difference between dreams and reality. The ever-shifting realities in the Middle East have been altering the plot lines of our story for a long time. But they do not change the ending. The grand finale can and must be a spectacular and happy ending. There is simply no other choice. And we can either play no role or some role. To play none is a dangerous choice and a dishonorable one.
*
We can only wish him luck …. any effort might lead to an end to the madness. BTW, Jason shares a page with me on the S H I T List 🙂
*
 

Playing your role: A Middle East peace drama

Op-ed: Actor Jason Alexander explains his decision to help resolve Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Jason Alexander

*

The Middle East is a very difficult stage to play upon. Without doubt, it is a good drama. And on occasion, there are situations so unimaginable, if not ludicrous, as to make them almost comic. But the cast is constantly changing, the audience is often disengaged and it seems at times that no one is actually running the show. So, how does one find their role?

On May 16, I will be joining a panel of experts organized by the OneVoice Movement at 92Y in New York City to explore this very point. We will discuss what civil society can do to rekindle and fuel the hopes for peace between Palestinians and Israelis. I am, by no means, one of those experts. Nor need I be to understand the importance of this cause and the value of participation from people in all walks of life – both directly engaged in this conflict and supporting from the outside.

I found that looking at the Israeli/Palestinian conflict from an outside vantage point was actually quite distancing. The history of the conflict, the personalities, the violence, the distrust, and the seeming lack of viable solutions made meaningful involvement feel impossible. What changed that, for me, was changing the vantage point.

I’ve visited the region several times, many with OneVoice during delegation trips, and each time my interest and activism in this conflict increased because I not only saw and heard with my own eyes and ears, but through those living the conflict daily.

Event number one: While visiting a kibbutz in the north of Israel, I learned of an interesting exchange during a security patrol. The kibbutz is situated on a hill at the bottom of which sits an Arab village in Lebanon. Despite the ongoing struggles, the kibbutz and the village had been good neighbors – sharing resources, celebrating each other’s holidays and generally looking out for each other. Then, a fundamentalist group came into the village and forcefully took over day-to-day operations.

Voice of humanity

To the outside observer, the two environments were now deadly enemies. One night on patrol, the security team for the kibbutz encountered an elderly man from the village who was about to fire two mortar rockets into the kibbutz. The team confiscated the rockets and then realized that they all knew this man. They reminded him of how they had all been such good neighbors, how their children all played together, of how they had spent many happy times together and then asked the man why he now hated them so much that he would attack them. The elderly man answered, “I don’t hate you. There is no work. There is no income. The fundamentalists pay me seventy-five dollars for each rocket I fire at an Israeli target. For one hundred and fifty dollars, I can support my family for six months. I cannot say no. But I have no hatred for you. In fact, give me the rockets and give me the one hundred fifty dollars and I will fire at the fundamentalists”. This “conflict of ideologies” was no such thing. This was a desperate act of survival.

Event number two occurred in Los Angeles in the mid-90s. OneVoice founders and board members Daniel Lubetzky and Mohammad Darawshe had come to talk about their vision for a new path to peace for Israel and Palestine. I was dubious. I thought this was merely an appeal for money that would be thrown cavalierly at an impossible project. But during their presentation, Mohammad spoke about why he chose to devote himself to OneVoice. He spoke of his young son, Fadi, and of how remarkable this boy’s dedication to goals had been. Fadi had promised his father that he would be the top student in his class, and succeeded. He promised he would be captain of the soccer team, and succeeded. And then one day, he came to his father and promised that he was going to be a martyr. He was twelve years old. Mohammad then spoke of how he would stop at nothing to make this goal one that his son would never keep. And as he was weeping, so was I. Mohammad was a father. I was a father. His child was my child. And I had to help.

Those are the stories that do not get told in this conflict. We on the outside do not get these glimpses of reality. We see and hear about Israelis and Palestinians only when they are defined by the global media as “occupiers,” “terrorists,” and “victims.” But we forget that they are fathers and mothers and sons and daughters and neighbors and doctors and shop-owners and farmers and students. It is those roles, those definitions that make possible the name of the organization I support – OneVoice. Because in those roles of family and community and shared interests, we do all speak with one voice – our voice of humanity.

At 92Y, OneVoice is unveiling its new strategic vision, the “Peoples’ Blueprint.” OneVoice is creating activists out of everyday people and forging links with local, national, and global stakeholders to create positive facts on the ground toward a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders. They are playing their role by jump starting the political process from the ground-up.

Though we may be actors in an important drama, we do know the difference between dreams and reality. The ever-shifting realities in the Middle East have been altering the plot lines of our story for a long time. But they do not change the ending. The grand finale can and must be a spectacular and happy ending. There is simply no other choice. And we can either play no role or some role. To play none is a dangerous choice and a dishonorable one.

So, with my concluding lines, may I implore you to see beyond the stereotypes and the news bites? Good men and women are struggling for their futures, their dignities, and their security. We have a role to play, no matter how small. I have taken a part, but this cast is large. And the players need you. It is a great story. You really shouldn’t miss it.  

 

 

Written FOR

3 Comments

  1. Au Matu said,

    May 17, 2013 at 21:44

    Reblogged this on Au Matu.

  2. Jon Olson said,

    May 18, 2013 at 08:15

    It’s interesting to see how there’s no Israeli culpability expressed in his message. There’s an impoverished Arab so destitute he accepts pay from terrorists to attack his neighbors he’s befriended in the past, and there’s an Arab child who excels at both academics and athletics only to seek as his greatest achievement the death of Jews. There are no accounts of Jews seeking to harm Arabs. This pretty much shows Jason Alexander for what I perceive him to be… someone with a very warped vision of the conflict, who can’t or won’t face up to Jewish culpability for Arab suffering and can’t bring himself to say what’s blatantly true… that Zionism is wrong, and that the people who have opposed it are now, and have always been, right. Jason Alexander is J Street in a single persona. Pro-Jewish, anti-Arab, but wants to be accepted and considered a nice guy regardless of the fact that he basically condones apartheid. He wants to be lovable, but he can’t extend that love to the level of embracing pure equality and integrated coexistence in the “holy land”. He can’t advocate giving up ethnic statehood and admitting that the “Jewish State” is a flawed concept. If he could, he might be a real advocate for peace, but as it stands I don’t envision him ever standing before an IDF soldier to block the expansion of a settlement. It just doesn’t ring as plausible. Jason Alexander is no Rachel Corrie, he’s not even in her league. He’s just a sock puppet looking for attention and pleading for acceptance, even if marginal acceptance, of what Israel has done. I for one won’t give it to him.

  3. KD said,

    May 21, 2013 at 15:55

    I agree with the first sentence of Jon Olson’s reply:
    It’s interesting to see how there’s no Israeli culpability expressed in his message.

    Yes, we only see HOW it is that Palestinians are led, against their wishes, to do something because of the fundamentalists on the Palestinian side.

    Also, this is an argument for an impossible two-state solution, which would merely formalize the participants in what will be a continuing struggle unless SOMEONE addresses the role of Israel in dismantling the region and destroying the lives of it’s original inhabitants.

    Yes, this reads like “We are so understanding and capable of complex thought that we can deal with attacking fundamentalists and intelligent children who use their greatest gifts to attack us. All we have to do is use them to paint ourselves as victims so they can’t be perceived as such.”

    I agree, this is totally disingenuous.